District 22 (Jurong Lake) vs District 5 (Greater Southern Waterfront): Future Growth Comparison

Comparison अद्यतन 6 मिनट पढ़ा
Key Takeaways
  • District 22 — Jurong Lake District: 29 condos | District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront: 137 condos
  • Lower avg PSF: District 22 — Jurong Lake District
  • Higher transaction volume: District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront
  • Data sourced from URA REALIS and OneMap geospatial database.

Side-by-Side Comparison

District 22 — Jurong Lake District vs District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront
MetricDistrict 22 — Jurong Lake DistrictDistrict 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront
Condo Count29137
Avg PSF$1,281 psf$1,578 psf
Median Price$1,554,751$2,026,830
Transaction Volume3,10014,632
Avg Walkability48.2/10045.1/100
Avg Investment Score56.6/10057.6/100
Avg TOP Year20052006
Avg Gross Yield2.8%2.0%

Price Analysis

$1,281 psf
District 22 — Jurong Lake District Avg PSF
$1,578 psf
District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront Avg PSF

District 22 — Jurong Lake District is the more affordable option, with an average PSF that is $298 psf (20.8%) lower than District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront.

In terms of median transaction price, District 22 — Jurong Lake District also offers a lower entry point at $1,554,751 compared to $2,026,830.

Lifestyle & Accessibility

48.2/100
District 22 — Jurong Lake District Walkability
45.1/100
District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront Walkability

District 22 — Jurong Lake District scores higher on walkability, reflecting better proximity to MRT stations, schools, hawker centres, and other daily amenities. This composite score accounts for seven weighted categories of nearby facilities.

💡
Verdict

District 22 — Jurong Lake District wins on price. District 22 — Jurong Lake District wins on walkability. District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront wins on investment score. District 22 — Jurong Lake District wins on rental yield.

Investment Potential

56.6/100
District 22 — Jurong Lake District Investment Score
57.6/100
District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront Investment Score
2.8%
District 22 — Jurong Lake District Avg Yield
2.0%
District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront Avg Yield

District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront has a higher average investment score, which factors in price momentum, rental yield, liquidity, MRT proximity, lease remaining, and district desirability.

In terms of gross rental yield, District 22 — Jurong Lake District delivers stronger returns. Note that yields shown are gross (annual rent / price) and do not account for maintenance fees, property tax, or vacancy.

Top Condos in Each Area

Top 5 Condos in District 22 — Jurong Lake District

Top condos in District 22 — Jurong Lake District by transaction volume
CondoAvg PSFTransactionsUnitsTenure
J'DEN$2,475 psf35636899 yrs lease commencing from 2023
THE LAKEGARDEN RESIDENCES$2,156 psf29330699 yrs lease commencing from 2023
SORA$2,211 psf20944099 years leasehold
J GATEWAY$1,894 psf17773899 yrs lease commencing from 2012
WESTWOOD RESIDENCES$1,256 psf16948099 yrs lease commencing from 2014

Top 5 Condos in District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront

Top condos in District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront by transaction volume
CondoAvg PSFTransactionsUnitsTenure
LANDED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT$1,829 psf5,780156Freehold
NORMANTON PARK$1,865 psf1,3961,84099 yrs lease commencing from 2019
PARC CLEMATIS$1,883 psf1,3821,45099 yrs lease commencing from 2019
ELTA$2,557 psf37650199 yrs lease commencing from 2024
FABER RESIDENCE$2,155 psf36939999 yrs lease commencing from 2025
🧮Calculate Total Acquisition Cost

Final Verdict

District 22 — Jurong Lake District

Pros & Cons

✓ Strengths

  • More affordable average PSF ($1,281 psf)
  • Better walkability score (48.2/100)
  • Higher gross rental yield (2.8%)

✗ Considerations

  • Lower average investment score (56.6)
  • Fewer condos available (29 developments)
  • Older average stock (avg TOP 2005)

District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront

Pros & Cons

✓ Strengths

  • Higher average investment score (57.6)
  • More condos to choose from (137 developments)
  • Newer average stock (avg TOP 2006)

✗ Considerations

  • Higher average PSF ($1,578 psf)
  • Lower walkability score (45.1/100)
  • Lower gross rental yield (2.0%)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more affordable, District 22 — Jurong Lake District or District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront?
District 22 — Jurong Lake District has a lower average PSF based on historical transaction data. However, affordability depends on unit size, tenure, and specific development. Use our Total Acquisition Cost calculator for a full picture.
Is District 22 — Jurong Lake District or District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront better for families?
Based on walkability scores (which include school and park proximity), District 22 — Jurong Lake District edges ahead. However, school proximity, unit size availability, and community feel all matter. We recommend visiting both areas to assess your specific family needs.
Which area is a better investment?
Investment potential depends on your strategy. For rental yield, District 22 — Jurong Lake District performs better. For overall investment score (combining yield, growth, liquidity), District 5 — Greater Southern Waterfront scores higher. Capital appreciation depends on future developments, government plans, and market conditions.
How current is this comparison data?
This comparison uses all available transaction data from URA and is regenerated periodically. Walkability and investment scores are computed from OneMap geospatial data and property attributes. Specific data freshness is indicated by the freshness badge at the top of the article.

Methodology & Sources

This analysis covers all available transaction data for the compared neighbourhoods and is updated periodically as new URA data is published.

Transaction data sourced from URA.

Median values used to minimize outlier impact. PSF = price per square foot.

संबंधित गुण: