Sherwood Tower

D21 (RCR) 99 yrs lease commencing from 1976
District 21 ·99 yrs lease commencing from 1976 ·Completed 1980
~$1,082 Avg PSF (12-month)
2.3% Rental yield
269 Total units
Category Ratings
Facilities
4.0
Unit size & layout
6.5
Value for money
6.5
Neighbourhood
6.0
MRT accessibility
8.5
Lease remaining
2.0

Overview & Key Facts

Sherwood Tower is the residential component of Bukit Timah Plaza, a mixed-use development completed in 1980 along Jalan Anak Bukit in District 21. Developed by Ocean & Capital Properties Pte Ltd (a Keppel Land joint venture), the project was conceived as one of Singapore’s earliest integrated commercial-residential complexes outside the city centre — a four-storey retail podium topped by a single 30-storey residential tower comprising 269 units. The 99-year lease commenced in 1976, leaving approximately 49 years remaining as of 2026 — a fact that dominates every investment calculation for this property.

The development sits on a substantial 17,253 sqm island site with triple road frontage along Jalan Anak Bukit, Upper Bukit Timah Road, and Dunearn Road. This is prime Bukit Timah land by any measure — the kind of site that developers covet for its size, zoning flexibility, and proximity to two MRT stations. Unit sizes are generous by modern standards, ranging from 1,324 to 1,830 sqft, reflecting an era when developers were less obsessed with quantum optimisation and more focused on livable proportions.

Let’s be direct about what Sherwood Tower is in 2026: it is primarily an en-bloc play in a prime location undergoing dramatic transformation. The building is 46 years old, the facilities are dated, and the lease is ticking past the halfway mark. But the site’s value — sitting beside the upcoming Reserve Residences integrated transport hub, within 330 metres of Beauty World MRT — is arguably higher than it has ever been. An en-bloc attempt was initiated in late 2022 but failed to achieve the required 80% consensus, complicated partly by Keppel Land’s ownership of the strata-titled carpark (22% of total strata area). The question is not whether another attempt will come, but when and at what price.

Developer
OCEAN & CAPITAL PROPERTIES PTE LTD
Tenure
99 yrs lease commencing from 1976
Total units
269
TOP year
1980
District
21 — RCR
Street
JALAN ANAK BUKIT
Lease remaining
~49 years (of 99)

Location & Connectivity

Sherwood Tower’s location is its strongest asset — full stop. Beauty World MRT (Downtown Line) is just 330 metres away, making this one of the most MRT-accessible older developments in the Bukit Timah corridor. King Albert Park MRT is 660 metres in the other direction, giving residents a genuine choice of two stations. The Downtown Line runs directly to the CBD (Telok Ayer, Downtown) in approximately 25 minutes without transfers — a commute that rivals many developments priced at double the PSF.

For drivers, the Pan Island Expressway (PIE) and Bukit Timah Expressway (BKE) are both accessible within minutes. The CBD is roughly 15–20 minutes by car during off-peak hours. Holland Village is a short drive south, and Orchard Road is about 10 minutes away.

The immediate neighbourhood is an education powerhouse. Anglo-Chinese Junior College sits just 360 metres away, Ngee Ann Polytechnic is 790 metres, Henry Park Primary 980 metres, and the Australian International School 1.37 km. Methodist Girls’ School, Pei Hwa Presbyterian Primary, and the Canadian International School are all within the broader catchment. For families prioritising school access, this cluster is difficult to match anywhere in Singapore at this price point.

Daily amenities are literally underfoot — Bukit Timah Plaza’s retail podium includes FairPrice Finest, restaurants, tuition centres, and everyday services. Beauty World Plaza, Beauty World Centre, and KAP Mall are all within walking distance. The arrival of The Reserve Residences next door (expected 2028) will add Bukit V mall with 215,280 sqft of retail, an air-conditioned bus interchange, and a direct underground link to Beauty World MRT — a transformative upgrade for the entire precinct.

Beauty World Transformation
URA’s Master Plan designates Beauty World as a “green urban village” with significant rejuvenation planned. The Reserve Residences integrated transport hub (2028), the new Bukit Timah Community Building (combining community club, market, hawker centre, sports hall, library, and eldercare), and the future Turf City residential transformation will collectively reshape this precinct. Sherwood Tower sits at the epicentre of this change — which simultaneously improves liveability and increases the site’s redevelopment value.

Schools & Education

1 primary school within the 1 km Priority Phase balloting radius.

Nearby Schools
SchoolTypeDistance
Anglo-Chinese Junior CollegejcWithin 1 km
Ngee Ann PolytechnictertiaryWithin 1 km
Henry Park Primary SchoolprimaryWithin 1 km
Singapore University of Social Sciencestertiary~1.3 km
Australian International Schoolinternational~1.4 km

Facilities

There is no sugarcoating this: Sherwood Tower’s facilities reflect its 1980 origins. The development offers a swimming pool, wading pool, BBQ pits, playground, covered car park, and 24-hour security. That is the complete list. There is no gym, no tennis court, no function room, and no clubhouse in the modern sense. The pool area is functional but dated, and the common areas show their age despite ongoing maintenance efforts.

“The facilities are basic — pool, BBQ area, playground. Nothing fancy, but then again, you’re paying Bukit Timah prices without the Bukit Timah condo facilities. The trade-off is the location.”

— Resident observation via PropertyGuru

The integrated retail podium partially compensates for what the residential facilities lack. Need a gym? There are commercial fitness options downstairs and in nearby malls. Want to eat out? Restaurants are in the same building. Need groceries? FairPrice Finest is on the ground floor. This integrated convenience is arguably more practical than a condo gym that closes at 10pm, though it is not the same as having resort-grade amenities at your doorstep. For a 269-unit development built in 1980, the facilities are exactly what you would expect — adequate, not aspirational. Buyers considering Sherwood Tower should be honest with themselves: you are buying location and en-bloc potential, not lifestyle amenities.


Unit Sizes & Layout

Sherwood Tower offers units ranging from approximately 1,324 to 1,830 sqft — sizes that would be classified as 3-bedroom to 4-bedroom by today’s standards but feel even more spacious because 1980s layouts wasted less space on elaborate foyers, planter boxes, and oversized balconies. The 30-storey tower means higher-floor units enjoy sweeping views over the Bukit Timah nature corridor, with the Bukit Timah Nature Reserve and its forested ridgeline forming a genuinely impressive backdrop that no future development can obstruct.

The layouts are straightforward and practical, typical of their era: regular rectangular rooms, dedicated kitchens (not open-concept), and sensible corridor proportions. Some units include duplex configurations — a rare feature that adds character and functional separation between living and sleeping floors. The finishings are dated and most resale buyers should budget $50,000–100,000 for a thorough renovation, but the bones are solid and the spatial generosity is something modern condos simply cannot replicate at this price point.

CPF & Financing Reality Check
With approximately 49 years remaining on the lease, buyers face immediate and escalating financing constraints. CPF usage is already subject to valuation limits based on remaining lease versus buyer’s age. In approximately 9 years (2035), the lease drops below 40 years — at which point CPF usage becomes severely restricted for most buyer age profiles. In 19 years (2045), below 30 years — effectively eliminating CPF entirely. Bank loan tenures are also capped by the remaining lease. Buyers must model their exit timeline carefully: if you plan to hold for 10+ years, your eventual buyer’s financing options will be materially worse than yours today.
Unit Mix (from transaction data)
BedroomsTransactionsAvg PSFAvg Price
1 BR1$1,066$700,000
2 BR3$926$727,667
3 BR1$1,161$1,500,000
4 BR50$994$1,571,578

Pricing & Market Position

Based on 55 recorded transactions, sale prices range from $535,000 to $2,000,000, averaging $1,508,398 (~$1,082 psf).

Rents range from $1,700 to $5,800 per month across 150 rental transactions. Current rental yield sits at approximately 2.3%.


Price Appreciation

From 2021 to 2025, the average PSF has appreciated by 29.7% (from $820 to $1,064 psf).

2023
+10.7%
$999 psf
2024
+2.7%
$1,026 psf
2025
+3.8%
$1,064 psf

Neighbourhood Comparison

The competitive set for Sherwood Tower is unusual because its lease position places it in a different category from the new launches dominating the Bukit Timah corridor. The Reserve Residences ($2,494 PSF, 99-year from 2021, 892 units) is literally next door and represents the neighbourhood’s future benchmark — integrated with Beauty World MRT, an air-conditioned bus interchange, and Bukit V mall. At 2.3 times Sherwood’s PSF, it illustrates just how much developers are willing to pay for this location with a fresh lease. Nava Grove ($2,487 PSF, 99-year from 2024) and Pinetree Hill ($2,485 PSF, 99-year from 2022) confirm that new Bukit Timah RCR pricing has settled firmly in the $2,400–2,500 PSF range.

For buyers comparing like-for-like, KI Residences ($1,953 PSF, 999-year from 1885, 660 units) offers near-perpetual tenure at a meaningful premium but in a slightly less MRT-convenient location. Forett at Bukit Timah ($2,128 PSF, freehold, 633 units) provides freehold security closer to Sixth Avenue. Both represent the “pay more, sleep better” alternative for buyers who want Bukit Timah without the lease anxiety.

The investment calculus hinges entirely on your en-bloc thesis. At $1,079 PSF on a 17,253 sqm site, Sherwood Tower’s implied land rate is significantly below what developers have recently paid for comparable Bukit Timah GLS plots. If a collective sale materialises at even a modest premium to current valuations, owners stand to profit handsomely — potentially enough to fund a unit at one of the newer competitors. The PSF trend ($820 → $902 → $999 → $1,026 → $1,064) shows steady appreciation despite the declining lease, suggesting the market is pricing in redevelopment optionality. But if en-bloc fails repeatedly and you need to exit in 15–20 years, the remaining 30–35 year lease will severely limit your buyer pool and pricing power.

District 21 Comparables
DevelopmentTenureTOPUnits~Avg PSF
SHERWOOD TOWER99 yrs lease commencing from 19761980269$1,082
THE RESERVE RESIDENCES99 yrs lease commencing from 20212023892$2,494
NAVA GROVE99 yrs lease commencing from 20242024552$2,489
PINETREE HILL99 yrs lease commencing from 20222023520$2,486
KI RESIDENCES AT BROOKVALE999 yrs lease commencing from 18852021660$1,955
FORETT@BUKIT TIMAHFreehold2021633$2,130

Lease Decay Analysis

The 99-year lease runs from 1976, meaning approximately 50 years have already been consumed. Roughly 49 years remain.

Lease Milestones
YearLease remainingImplication
2026 (now)~49 yearsCPF restrictions may apply
2035~39 yearsSignificant financing restrictions for next buyer
2075ExpiryLease reverts to state

ShiokNest Scores

Our proprietary scoring system evaluates SHERWOOD TOWER across multiple dimensions.

Walkability
45/100
MRT: 25/25, School: 20/20, Hawker: 0/15, Mall: 0/15, Park: 0/10, Supermarket: 0/10, Clinic: 0/5
Investment
66/100
+5.8% YoY ·3.7% yield ·11 txns/yr ·49 yrs left ·0.33 km to MRT ·-7.7% district YoY ·En-bloc 79/100
Profitability
70/100
Win rate: 86 — 14 transaction pairs, 86% profitable, avg +$185,214
En-Bloc Potential
79/100
Verdict: High
Overall ShiokNest Score
70/100 — composite of walkability, investment, profitability, en-bloc, and market trend factors.

What Residents Say

“Location is the main draw. Walk to Beauty World MRT in 5 minutes, FairPrice downstairs, food everywhere. The building is old, yes, but you’re living in Bukit Timah for the price of a Jurong condo.”

— Long-term owner via 99.co

“Big units, solid construction from the old days. My 1,600 sqft feels like a landed house compared to the shoebox condos they build now. Have been here 15 years and the management keeps things running.”

— Resident review via PropertyGuru

“Let’s be real — everyone here is waiting for en bloc. The building is showing its age, the lifts are slow, some common areas need work. But the location with the new developments coming up makes this site incredibly valuable.”

— Owner perspective via EdgeProp

Resident sentiment at Sherwood Tower splits clearly along two lines. Long-term owners — many of whom have lived here for 15–25 years — appreciate the spacious units, central Bukit Timah location, and integrated retail convenience. They acknowledge the building’s age pragmatically, viewing it as an acceptable trade-off for a location that would cost $2–3 million more in a newer development. The second group views ownership primarily through the en-bloc lens, tolerating dated facilities and common areas in anticipation of a collective sale that would deliver a significant windfall. Both groups agree on one thing: the location is exceptional and only getting better with the Beauty World transformation underway.


Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths
  • Prime Bukit Timah location — 330m to Beauty World MRT (Downtown Line)
  • Large 17,253 sqm site with triple road frontage — highly attractive for redevelopment
  • En-bloc score 79/100 — strong structural case for collective sale
  • Spacious units (1,324–1,830 sqft) unavailable in modern developments at this price
  • Dramatically lower PSF ($1,079) vs new launches ($2,400–2,500) in same location
  • Integrated with Bukit Timah Plaza retail — FairPrice, restaurants, services downstairs
  • Elite school cluster — ACJC 360m, Ngee Ann Poly 790m, Henry Park Primary 980m
  • Beauty World transformation (Reserve Residences, Bukit V mall, transport hub) enhances site value
  • Strong rental demand — $3,235/month average supported by education and MRT proximity
  • Steady PSF appreciation ($820→$1,064) despite lease decay — market pricing in en-bloc option
Weaknesses
  • Only 49 years remaining on 99-year lease — past the halfway mark and accelerating decay
  • CPF usage becomes severely restricted in ~9 years (below 40yr threshold)
  • Below 30-year lease threshold in ~19 years — effectively no CPF for future buyers
  • Basic 1980-era facilities — pool, BBQ, playground only; no gym, tennis court, or clubhouse
  • Building is 46 years old — lifts, common areas, and facade showing significant age
  • Previous en-bloc attempt (2022) failed to reach 80% consensus
  • Keppel Land owns strata-titled carpark (22% of strata area) — complicates collective sale
  • Low gross yield at 2.34% — capital tied up relative to rental returns
  • Renovation budget of $50K–100K typically needed for resale units
  • Exit strategy highly dependent on en-bloc timing — holding too long compounds lease risk
Best for — En-bloc investors with 5–10yr horizon Families prioritising Bukit Timah schools Buyers wanting space over newness Cash or minimal-loan buyers (CPF constraints) Landlords targeting education-belt tenants Owner-occupiers comfortable with older buildings Long-term holders (15+ years) CPF-dependent buyers Buyers wanting modern condo lifestyle

Verdict

Sherwood Tower is not a conventional condo purchase, and it should not be evaluated as one. At an average PSF of $1,079, it sits dramatically below every new launch in the Bukit Timah corridor — Reserve Residences at $2,494 PSF, Nava Grove at $2,487, Pinetree Hill at $2,485. Even the 999-year KI Residences commands $1,953 PSF. That discount — roughly 55–60% below new launch pricing — exists entirely because of the 49-year lease. The market is pricing the lease decay correctly, but it may be under-pricing the en-bloc optionality.

The en-bloc case is compelling on paper. The site is 17,253 sqm with triple road frontage, zoned for higher-density redevelopment under URA’s Master Plan, sitting 330 metres from an MRT station in the heart of Bukit Timah’s transformation zone. With The Reserve Residences establishing new benchmark pricing next door, a successful collective sale could deliver significant premium over current market values. The 79/100 en-bloc score reflects genuine structural factors — site size, location desirability, remaining development potential — not speculation. However, the 2022 attempt’s failure to reach 80% consensus (complicated by Keppel’s carpark strata ownership) is a reminder that en-bloc is never guaranteed, regardless of how logical it appears.

For owner-occupiers, Sherwood Tower offers something rare: genuinely spacious units in prime Bukit Timah at a quantum of $1.3–1.8 million — less than many 2-bedroom units in new launches nearby. The Beauty World MRT access is excellent, the school cluster is elite, and the neighbourhood is about to be transformed. But you must accept the building’s age, basic facilities, and the mathematical certainty that the lease will constrain your exit options more with each passing year. The gross yield of 2.34% is low, reflecting high absolute rents ($3,235/month) against still-substantial capital values that haven’t fully corrected for the lease position.

The honest assessment: Sherwood Tower is a calculated bet. If en-bloc succeeds within the next 5–10 years, buyers at today’s prices will do very well. If it doesn’t, the property remains liveable and rentable but will face accelerating value erosion as financing restrictions tighten. This is not a set-and-forget purchase — it requires active monitoring of collective sale developments and a clear exit strategy. For the right buyer profile, the risk-reward is attractive. For everyone else, the newer competitors at higher PSF offer more certainty.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much lease is left on Sherwood Tower?
The 99-year lease commenced in 1976, leaving approximately 49 years as of 2026. This is past the halfway mark, which means lease decay is accelerating and will increasingly affect CPF usage, bank financing, and resale values.
When will CPF restrictions affect Sherwood Tower buyers?
CPF usage is already subject to valuation limits based on the remaining lease relative to the buyer's age. In approximately 9 years (2035), the lease drops below 40 years — severely restricting CPF for most buyers. By 2045 (below 30 years), CPF is effectively eliminated. Buyers should factor this into their exit timeline.
What is Sherwood Tower's en-bloc potential?
The en-bloc score is 79/100 — high by any measure. The 17,253 sqm site with triple road frontage, 330m MRT proximity, and URA Master Plan zoning for higher density make it attractive for redevelopment. An attempt in 2022 failed to reach 80% consensus, partly due to Keppel Land's carpark strata ownership. Most analysts expect future attempts as the lease shortens.
Why did the 2022 en-bloc attempt fail?
The collective sales committee could not secure the required 80% owner consensus. A complicating factor is Keppel Land's ownership of the strata-titled carpark, which represents 22% of total strata area and gives the carpark owner significant influence over any collective sale vote.
How does Sherwood Tower compare to The Reserve Residences next door?
The Reserve Residences (99-year from 2021) sells at $2,494 PSF — more than double Sherwood Tower's $1,079 PSF. It offers brand-new facilities, integrated transport hub with Beauty World MRT, and Bukit V mall. The price gap reflects Sherwood's lease decay and age, but also illustrates the land value developers assign to this exact location.
Is Sherwood Tower a good rental investment?
Gross yield is 2.34% with average rents of $3,235/month. This is below average for District 21. However, rental demand is strong due to proximity to ACJC, Ngee Ann Polytechnic, and international schools. The low yield reflects that capital values haven't fully discounted the lease position — the market is pricing in en-bloc optionality.