Kiara 10
Overview & Key Facts
Kiara 10 (also marketed as Kiara Ten) is a small 10-unit freehold strata-landed cluster development on Lorong Marzuki in the Kembangan pocket of District 14 (OCR), jointly developed by Pinnacle Assets Group and Fisson Group of Companies and completed in 2012. The single most important framing fact for any buyer landing on this page is that this is not a conventional condominium. The site comprises 10 strata-titled bungalows / cluster homes built on freehold land — that is why the site-wide PSF prints at roughly S$685, an apparent “number” that would be nonsensical for a typical condo and is in fact a function of the very large strata-area gross floor counts that cluster-landed product carries. PSF is the wrong unit of comparison here; quantum and yield are the right ones.
The transaction profile reinforces the cluster-landed character. Five resale caveats are on record averaging S$3,212,200 with a median of S$3,008,000, and five rental transactions average S$8,040 per month with a median of S$8,200 — a tight, consistent rental band that yields a credible 3.27% gross yield on the resale quantum. Those numbers are wholly inconsistent with apartment-condo economics in D14 and wholly consistent with three-storey freehold cluster bungalows with private enclosed garages, multiple bedrooms across multiple levels, and small private outdoor space. Kembangan MRT (East–West Line) at 510 metres is a genuine 6–7 minute walk, anchoring a single-stop ride to Paya Lebar interchange and a one-seat ride to City Hall and Raffles Place.
The investment thesis is correspondingly specific: this is a freehold cluster-landed asset with quasi-bungalow living, EWL-walkable connectivity, and a defensible 3.27% gross yield, set against the structural reality that the buyer pool for 10-unit strata-landed product is naturally narrow and turnover is glacial. Buyers who walk in expecting condo facilities, condo liquidity, and condo-style price discovery will be disappointed. Buyers who walk in wanting a freehold roof over their family with EWL access, a private pool footprint, and modest rental optionality should be reading a different kind of underwriting altogether — one that benchmarks against landed and cluster product, not D14 apartment cohort.
Location & Connectivity
Lorong Marzuki is a quiet residential lorong in the Kembangan / Telok Kurau triangle of District 14, threading off Jalan Eunos and the Sims Avenue East / Changi Road arterial. The setting is genuinely low-rise and residential — a mix of landed terraces, semi-detached homes, and small strata-landed clusters — and the immediate environment feels closer to a landed enclave than to a modern condo precinct. Kembangan MRT (EWL) at 510 metres is the headline connectivity story: a 6–7 minute walk delivers a one-stop ride to Paya Lebar interchange (Circle Line) and a one-seat ride into the CBD via City Hall and Raffles Place. Eunos MRT (EWL) at 770 metres is a credible second walkable station, and Kaki Bukit MRT (Downtown Line) at 1.29 km plus Ubi MRT (DTL) at 1.33 km add Downtown Line redundancy by short bus or drive. Dual-line coverage matters disproportionately for landed-cluster buyers who typically run two cars but want partner / older-children single-seat rail access.
The school cluster is sparse on a strict walking-radius basis but functional by D14 standards. Canossa Catholic Primary at 1.07 km is the closest MOE primary — not quite a comfortable walk, but a one-stop bus ride. Telok Kurau Primary at 1.27 km, TKGS (Tanjong Katong Girls’ School) at 1.85 km, and Chung Cheng High (Main) at 1.90 km broaden the secondary-school options. Canadian International School (Tanjong Katong) at 1.92 km and EtonHouse International (Broadrick) at 1.95 km add international-school anchors that matter for the rental-tenant pool. Phase 2A balloting math at the closer MOE primaries is borderline rather than comfortable — buyers stress-testing the catchment should plan for the 1km buffer on Telok Kurau Pri specifically.
Day-to-day amenity is dominated by Kembangan’s mature retail spine and Joo Chiat / Katong’s food culture. Kembangan Plaza, the cluster of kopitiams and groceries around Kembangan MRT, the Eunos hawker concentration, and the famous Geylang Serai market & food centre at Paya Lebar are all within a short bus or drive radius. Parkway Parade and i12 Katong are the larger-format mall options on the East Coast Road corridor. The East Coast Park shoreline is reachable in 8–10 minutes by car, and Pelton Canal park-connector adds a ribbon of green within walking distance. Changi Airport is a 12–15 minute drive via the PIE / ECP — a meaningful quality-of-life factor for frequent-traveller households. The URA Master Plan Paya Lebar Air Base redevelopment, due to begin land release post-2030, is the long-dated catalyst that frames the broader Kembangan / Eunos / Paya Lebar corridor — though the pricing impact on a 10-unit freehold cluster will be more amenity-led than density-led.
Schools & Education
| School | Type | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| Canossa Catholic Primary School | primary | ~1.1 km |
| Telok Kurau Primary School | primary | ~1.3 km |
| Tanjong Katong Girls' School | secondary | ~1.9 km |
| Chung Cheng High School (Main) | secondary | ~1.9 km |
| Canadian International School (Tanjong Katong) | international | ~1.9 km |
| Broadrick Secondary School | secondary | ~2.0 km |
| EtonHouse International School (Broadrick) | international | ~2.0 km |
Facilities
At 10 units of strata-landed cluster bungalows, Kiara 10 is provisioned in the cluster-landed mode rather than the conventional condo mode. Communal facilities centre on a small shared swimming pool set within a manicured landscaped courtyard, with covered or basement private parking allocated per bungalow, and 24-hour security gate access. There is no gym, no clubhouse, no children’s wet-play deck, no concierge, no function room — the maintenance-fund economics of a 10-unit block cannot support, and were never designed to support, a full-amenity facilities deck. What buyers gain instead, inside their own four walls, is the genuinely high-value substitute: private internal staircases, multiple living levels, private enclosed garages, private outdoor space (terrace / garden / roof terrace depending on layout), and the privacy that bungalow living delivers but condo living cannot.
The economics of cluster-landed maintenance are also distinct. Monthly maintenance for 10-unit cluster developments of this vintage typically lands in the S$600–900/month per unit range — meaningfully lower than full-facility condos at comparable quantum, but higher than landed terrace ownership where exterior maintenance is fully owner-borne. The trade-off is deliberate: a small shared pool, shared landscaping, and shared security cover the lifestyle gap between true detached landed and conventional condo without imposing condo-sized monthly fees.
“What you’re really paying for at Kiara Ten is three storeys of your own house with a private garage, a small shared pool you actually use, and freehold tenure — not a condo with a long facilities list. People who walk in expecting a gym are missing the point.”
— Owner perspective on Kiara Ten cluster-living lifestyle via Singapore Expats community directory
Households expecting a resort-style facilities deck should rule this out immediately. The substitute facilities ecosystem is straightforward: ActiveSG Bedok Swimming Complex and Bedok Sports Centre cover gym and pool depth; East Coast Park covers cycling, jogging, and family weekend amenity; the Joo Chiat & Katong dining belt covers the F&B layer that no in-compound clubhouse can match. The Kiara 10 facilities profile is correctly read as “cluster-landed”, not as “under-amenitised condo”.
Pricing & Market Position
Based on 5 recorded transactions, sale prices range from $2,700,000 to $3,935,000, averaging $3,212,200 (~$685 psf).
Rents range from $6,000 to $9,000 per month across 5 rental transactions. Current rental yield sits at approximately 3.3%.
Price Appreciation
From 2021 to 2025, the average PSF has appreciated by 38.5% (from $494 to $685 psf).
Neighbourhood Comparison
PSF benchmarking against D14 condo product is the wrong framework for this asset. The headline D14 cohort — Parc Esta at S$2,183 psf, Sims Urban Oasis at S$1,761 psf, Penrose at S$1,928 psf, Euhabitat at S$1,326 psf, and Antares at S$1,833 psf — is 99-year leasehold apartment-condo product with full facilities, large transaction liquidity, and a wholly different ownership proposition. Comparing Kiara 10’s S$685 psf against any of those numbers is meaningless because the strata floor area accounting is fundamentally different: a 4,500 sq ft strata bungalow is not three 1,500 sq ft apartments stacked on top of each other, even though the PSF math superficially suggests the comparison.
The honest framing is that Kiara 10 sits in a separate asset class from the D14 condo cohort. The right comparison set is freehold strata-landed cluster product across the East — small 8–15 unit cluster developments in Joo Chiat, Katong, Telok Kurau, and the Kembangan / Eunos lorongs — where freehold cluster bungalows transact at quanta in the S$2.8M–4.0M range with rental yields in the 2.8–3.5% band. Against that cohort, Kiara 10’s S$3.0M median quantum and 3.27% yield are competitively positioned. Against the D14 condo cohort, the comparison is structurally invalid. Buyers comparing Kiara 10 to Parc Esta or Sims Urban Oasis should pause and ask whether they want a condo with facilities and liquidity (in which case the condos are the right answer) or a freehold cluster-bungalow with private garage and multi-storey living (in which case Kiara 10 belongs in the shortlist alongside other strata-landed cluster product, not alongside apartments). Choosing the wrong reference cohort is the most common analytical error a buyer makes on this listing.
| Development | Tenure | TOP | Units | ~Avg PSF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIARA 10 | Freehold | — | — | $685 |
| PARC ESTA | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2018 | 2021 | 1,399 | $2,183 |
| SIMS URBAN OASIS | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2014 | 2020 | 1,024 | $1,761 |
| PENROSE | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2019 | 2021 | 566 | $1,928 |
| EUHABITAT | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2010 | 2016 | 697 | $1,326 |
| THE ANTARES | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2018 | 2021 | 265 | $1,833 |
ShiokNest Scores
Our proprietary scoring system evaluates KIARA 10 across multiple dimensions.
What Residents Say
“Kembangan MRT in seven minutes, City Hall in fifteen by train, three storeys of our own with a private garage, freehold — that’s the package. The pool is small, we use it on weekends, the kids love the privacy. Maintenance is half what our friends pay at full-facility condos. We’re here for the long haul.”
— Owner-occupier on Kiara Ten cluster-bungalow living and EWL access via PropertyGuru project discussion
“We’re renting because the kids are at Canadian International. The drive is six minutes, the unit is huge, the freehold story doesn’t affect us as tenants but the build quality clearly does — the place feels solid, the layout is generous, much better than the condo we came from in D15.”
— Expat tenant family on Kiara Ten layout and international-school proximity via Singapore Expats community reviews
“Looked at it as an investment. The yield is real, the freehold is real, but the liquidity is not — five caveats in a decade is not a market, it’s a private club. If you can’t commit to a 10–15 year hold, walk away.”
— Investor commentary on Kiara Ten transaction depth and hold horizon via Stacked Homes reader discussion
Across community discussion the recurring split is between owner-occupier households who love the freehold + cluster-bungalow + EWL combination and accept the illiquidity as the price of admission, and condo-trained investor-buyers who underwrite Kiara 10 as “a condo with bad facilities” and walk away once they understand the cluster-landed liquidity profile. Both readings are internally consistent; they apply to different buyer types. The five rental transactions on 10 units (a 0.5x rental turnover) signal that owner-occupier dominance is real and that the rental market is genuine but thin — the asset is not a high-frequency landlord vehicle.
Strengths & Weaknesses
- Freehold tenure — no lease-decay clock, no MAS 60-year financing cliff, no CPF 75-year usage tightening
- Strata-landed cluster bungalows — three-storey layouts with private garages, multi-level living, private outdoor space
- Kembangan MRT (EWL) at 510m — genuine 6–7 minute walk, one-seat ride to City Hall and Raffles Place
- Eunos MRT (EWL) at 770m as second walkable station; Kaki Bukit and Ubi (DTL) within 1.3km add line redundancy
- Credible 3.27% gross yield — five rental transactions clustered tightly at S$8,000–8,200/month
- Boutique 10-unit cluster — true low-density living, neighbour familiarity, owner-occupier dominance
- Maintenance economics meaningfully lower than full-facility condos at comparable quantum (~S$600–900/mo)
- Strong international-school anchor — Canadian International School TK at 1.92km, EtonHouse Broadrick at 1.95km
- Joo Chiat / Katong dining and amenity belt within short drive; Parkway Parade and i12 Katong on East Coast Road
- Long-dated Paya Lebar Air Base redevelopment optionality reshaping the broader corridor post-2030
- Cluster-landed illiquidity — five resale caveats in development history, exit horizons measured in years
- PSF S$685 is structurally non-comparable to D14 condo cohort — frequent buyer-side analytical error
- En-bloc score 17/100 — strata-landed cluster product almost never goes collective-sale; remove from underwriting
- Minimal communal facilities — small shared pool only, no gym, no clubhouse, no concierge
- School catchment is sparse on strict walking radius — Telok Kurau Pri at 1.27km is borderline for Phase 2A
- 2012 vintage — units typically need S$120,000–250,000 mid-cycle refresh for premium-rental positioning
- Walkability score 52/100 reflects sparse retail and amenity within strict 500m radius
- CBD access is one-seat via EWL but lacks the redundancy of central-line cohort
- Buyer pool is structurally narrow — cluster-landed-aware buyers only, condo-trained buyers self-select out
- Composite ShiokNest score (22/100) penalises cluster-landed product unfairly versus a fair peer-cohort lens
Verdict
Kiara 10 is a specialist asset with a coherent thesis: a small, freehold, strata-landed cluster development with three-storey bungalow layouts, a 10-unit boutique footprint, EWL-walkable connectivity at Kembangan MRT (510m), and a credible 3.27% gross yield supported by a tight rental band around S$8,000–8,200/month. For households trading down from full landed but unwilling to give up freehold tenure, private garage, and multi-storey living — or for cluster-landed-aware investors targeting freehold yield in the East — the asset has a clean and defensible story.
The case against is structural rather than situational. Cluster-landed product is illiquid: five resale transactions across the entire history of the development means price discovery is thin, exit horizons must be measured in years rather than months, and any forced-sale event (divorce, relocation, estate) will be priced at a meaningful discount to fair value. Facilities are minimal by condo standards. The school catchment is sparse on a strict walking-radius basis. CBD access via the EWL is one-seat to City Hall but does not match the central-line redundancy of the orchard / river-valley cohort. Buyers who treat Kiara 10 as “a freehold condo at S$685 psf” are misreading the asset; buyers who treat it as a strata-bungalow with shared pool and security are reading it correctly.
The ShiokNest composite score of 22/100 looks pessimistic at first glance and reflects how the composite penalises cluster-landed product: facilities (6.5/10) and value (7.0/10) carry positive weight, MRT access (8.0/10) and unit layout (8.5/10) carry strong weight, lease (10/10) is structurally maxed, and neighbourhood (6.5/10) is fair — but the depressed en-bloc score (17/100) and the model’s walkability calibration (52/100) drag the composite mechanically. Investor-buyers should weight the lease, layout, and yield scores far more heavily than the composite suggests; the composite is fair as a peer-to-peer condo benchmark and unfair as a peer-to-peer cluster-landed benchmark.