Grosvenor View

D14 (RCR) Freehold
District 14 ·Freehold ·Completed 2005
~$1,611 Avg PSF (12-month)
3.1% Rental yield
93 Total units
Category Ratings
Facilities
6.0
Unit size & layout
7.0
Value for money
7.5
Neighbourhood
6.5
MRT accessibility
5.5
Lease remaining
9.5

Overview & Key Facts

Grosvenor View is a modest freehold development tucked into Lengkong Empat in District 14, completed in 2005 by SB Development Pte Ltd. With just 93 units, it sits firmly in boutique territory — a stark contrast to the mega-developments that have come to define much of Singapore’s private condo market. The development occupies a quiet residential enclave off Bedok Reservoir Road, flanked by landed housing and low-rise apartments.

This is not a project that will dominate a developer’s brochure. There is no grand clubhouse, no resort-style lagoon pool, no “thematic zones” to speak of. What Grosvenor View offers instead is a combination that has become increasingly rare in the OCR: freehold tenure, a low-density compound, and pricing that remains well below the District 14 average. For the right buyer — typically an own-stay family or a long-horizon landlord — that quiet equation is the story.

Transaction volume reflects the size of the development rather than any lack of interest. Over the last 12 months, 14 sales and 64 rentals have been recorded, with median prices of S$1.43 million and median monthly rent of S$3,700. Average PSF sits at S$1,611 — a 30–40% discount to newer 99-year launches in the same district.

Developer
SB DEVELOPMENT PTE LTD
Tenure
Freehold
Total units
93
TOP year
2005
District
14 — OCR
Street
LENGKONG EMPAT

Location & Connectivity

Grosvenor View’s location is the single most important variable in any honest assessment. The nearest MRT is Kembangan on the East-West Line, roughly 770 metres away — walkable in about 10 minutes, but not a comfortable daily stroll in Singapore’s climate, especially with bags or children. Kaki Bukit (Downtown Line) is slightly further at 880 metres, while the forthcoming connectivity from Bedok North (1.04 km) rounds out the picture. None of these stations sit right at the doorstep.

For drivers, the value proposition improves considerably. The PIE and ECP are both within a short drive, putting the CBD roughly 20 minutes away in off-peak traffic and Changi Airport under 15 minutes. Paya Lebar Quarter and the growing commercial cluster at Paya Lebar Central are reachable in around 10 minutes. For households with at least one vehicle, Grosvenor View’s location trade-off is far less punitive than the raw MRT distance suggests.

Daily amenities are clustered around Bedok Reservoir and Kaki Bukit. Bedok Reservoir itself is about 1 km away, offering one of the more scenic park runs on the east side of the island. Heartland Mall at Kembangan and the older shophouse stretches along Bedok Reservoir Road cover most grocery, F&B, and errand needs. Tampines Mall, Changi City Point, and the Paya Lebar Quarter ecosystem are all accessible by car or bus within 10–15 minutes.

Honest MRT math
The 770 m walk to Kembangan looks reasonable on a map but means a sweaty 10–12 minutes each way in practice. Bus links are adequate but not frequent. Households relying primarily on public transport should stress-test the daily commute before committing.

Schools & Education

Nearby Schools
SchoolTypeDistance
Canossa Catholic Primary Schoolprimary~1.6 km
Telok Kurau Primary Schoolprimary~1.7 km
Temasek Junior Collegejc~1.9 km
Temasek Primary Schoolprimary~1.9 km

Facilities

At 93 units, Grosvenor View is a boutique development and its facilities are scoped accordingly. Expect the essentials — a lap pool, a modest gym, a children’s wading pool, BBQ pits, and basic function space. There is no air-conditioned sports dome, no tennis court, no onsen, no grand clubhouse. Nor should there be: spreading resort-scale amenities across 93 units would push maintenance fees into uncomfortable territory.

The upside of the humble amenity footprint is the inverse: low maintenance fees and virtually no queue for anything. Residents at larger developments frequently complain about fully-booked function rooms, crowded pools on weekends, and waiting lists for barbecue pits. At Grosvenor View, those frictions simply do not exist. For families who prioritise a quiet swim or a relaxed weekend BBQ over facility breadth, the calculus flips in favour of the smaller development.

Landscaping is adequate rather than showpiece. The compound feels mature — the trees and greenery have had two decades to settle in, which gives the development a more established, residential feel than newer launches with their still-growing landscaping. This is a quiet, low-key environment rather than a lifestyle amenity stack.


Unit Sizes & Layout

Grosvenor View’s unit mix skews toward mid-sized family configurations, with 2-bedroom, 3-bedroom, and a small number of penthouse layouts. Layouts from the 2005 era tend to be more generous than contemporary equivalents — corridors are wider, bedrooms are usable, and yards and utility rooms are specified as functional service areas rather than token shoeboxes. This is a meaningful advantage over newer 99-year launches in the same price bracket, where efficiency ratios have tightened considerably.

Finishings reflect the mid-2000s mid-market positioning. Expect homogeneous tile flooring in living areas, laminate or parquet in bedrooms, and standard-grade bathroom fittings. Buyers should budget for renovation — particularly kitchens and bathrooms — to bring the interior up to current expectations. The bones of the units are sound, but two decades of wear mean nearly every unit will benefit from some cosmetic work on handover.

Stack & orientation notes
Units facing the internal pool and inner landscaping enjoy the quietest environment. Stacks oriented toward Lengkong Empat catch some road noise but benefit from better ventilation and natural light. Given the boutique scale, there is no dominant “best stack” — viewing the specific unit matters more here than it would at a larger development.

Unit Mix (from transaction data)
BedroomsTransactionsAvg PSFAvg Price
1 BR2$1,217$799,400
2 BR3$1,307$1,154,000
3 BR5$1,238$1,547,800
4 BR3$1,205$1,987,333
5 BR1$1,025$2,428,000

Pricing & Market Position

Based on 14 recorded transactions, sale prices range from $788,800 to $2,428,000, averaging $1,513,557 (~$1,611 psf).

Rents range from $1,800 to $5,000 per month across 64 rental transactions. Current rental yield sits at approximately 3.1%.


Price Appreciation

From 2021 to 2026, the average PSF has appreciated by 47.1% (from $1,180 to $1,736 psf).

2023
-21.4%
$937 psf
2025
+58.7%
$1,486 psf
2026
+16.8%
$1,736 psf

Neighbourhood Comparison

Within District 14, Grosvenor View occupies a distinct niche. Parc Esta (99-year, 1,399 units, S$2,182 psf) offers MRT-adjacent convenience at Eunos and a full facility suite, but at a 35% PSF premium and with a lease that started in 2018. Sims Urban Oasis (99-year, S$1,760 psf) and The Antares (99-year, S$1,833 psf) sit in similar territory. Euhabitat (99-year, S$1,326 psf) is the only nearby comparable that undercuts Grosvenor View on psf, but it is leasehold from 2010 and lacks the freehold tenure advantage.

The value case is straightforward: for a buyer who explicitly values freehold tenure and is willing to accept an MRT trade-off, Grosvenor View is one of the few D14 options that delivers. For buyers indifferent to tenure, better-located 99-year alternatives exist at comparable or only modestly higher prices. The choice is less about which is “better” and more about which constraint matters more to the individual household.

District 14 Comparables
DevelopmentTenureTOPUnits~Avg PSF
GROSVENOR VIEWFreehold200593$1,611
PARC ESTA99 yrs lease commencing from 201820211,399$2,184
SIMS URBAN OASIS99 yrs lease commencing from 201420201,024$1,762
PENROSE99 yrs lease commencing from 20192021566$1,928
EUHABITAT99 yrs lease commencing from 20102016697$1,326
THE ANTARES99 yrs lease commencing from 20182021265$1,833

ShiokNest Scores

Our proprietary scoring system evaluates GROSVENOR VIEW across multiple dimensions.

Walkability
30/100
MRT: 15/25, School: 0/20, Hawker: 5/15, Mall: 0/15, Park: 5/10, Supermarket: 0/10, Clinic: 5/5
Investment
44/100
Insufficient data ·2.9% yield ·1 txns/yr ·Freehold ·0.77 km to MRT ·+4.5% district YoY ·En-bloc 47/100
Profitability
65/100
Win rate: 100 — 3 transaction pairs, 100% profitable, avg +$124,933
En-Bloc Potential
47/100
Verdict: Moderate
Overall ShiokNest Score
37/100 — composite of walkability, investment, profitability, en-bloc, and market trend factors.

What Residents Say

“Very quiet, very low density. You actually recognise your neighbours here, which is impossible at the big condos. Pool is never crowded even on weekends.”

— Resident sentiment via EdgeProp

“MRT is the pain point. 10-minute walk sounds fine until you do it in the rain with groceries. If you don’t drive, think twice.”

— Resident sentiment via property forums

Feedback across rental and owner communities paints a consistent picture: the development is appreciated for its quietness, freehold tenure, and low-density feel, while consistently flagged for its MRT distance and dated interior finishings. Management is unremarkable — neither a standout strength nor a standing complaint — which for a 20-year-old boutique development should probably be read as a quiet positive. Maintenance fees remain reasonable relative to the freehold tenure and compound upkeep.


Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths
  • Freehold tenure — rare in D14 at this price point
  • Low-density boutique scale (93 units) — quiet, familiar community
  • Pricing 25–40% below comparable 99-year launches nearby
  • Generous 2005-era unit layouts vs newer shoebox formats
  • Mature landscaping — compound feels settled and established
  • Facilities never overcrowded — no booking queues
  • PIE / ECP access good for drivers (CBD ~20 min)
  • Proximity to Bedok Reservoir for park running and recreation
  • Rental demand stable — 64 rentals in last 12 months
  • Reasonable maintenance fees relative to freehold tenure
Weaknesses
  • MRT not walkable in practice — 770 m to Kembangan (10–12 min)
  • Limited facilities — no tennis, no sports dome, no grand clubhouse
  • Interior finishings dated — renovation budget essential
  • Low transaction volume reduces liquidity at exit
  • No primary schools within 1 km radius for P1 balloting
  • Modest 3.1% gross yield for a freehold asset
  • Uneven PSF trend reflects thin transaction history
  • Public transport dependent households will struggle
  • Boutique scale limits amenity breadth vs mega-condos
Best for — Freehold seekers Car-owning families Long-horizon own-stay Quiet-living preference Renovation-comfortable buyers Long-term landlords MRT-dependent commuters Short-term capital flippers

Verdict

Grosvenor View is a classic “quiet value” play. At S$1,611 psf on a freehold title, it sits roughly 25–40% below nearby 99-year launches such as Parc Esta (S$2,182 psf) and The Antares (S$1,833 psf). The freehold tenure matters: buyers are not watching a lease clock tick, and the development is genuinely inheritable across generations without the 2047-style cliff that looms over many leasehold comparables.

The trade-offs are honest. You give up MRT walkability, facility breadth, and the “new development” sheen. You accept a modest gross yield of roughly 3.1% — respectable for a freehold asset but not the stuff of aggressive landlord spreadsheets. Price appreciation over the last five years has been uneven (the PSF trend shows a dip before recovery), reflecting the development’s lower liquidity and the general lag that smaller freehold OCR properties experience in rising markets.

For an own-stay family with a car, a medium-to-long horizon, and a preference for space and tenure over convenience and prestige, Grosvenor View is quietly compelling. For investors chasing capital appreciation or MRT-adjacent rental demand, better-positioned assets exist in the same district at a cost. Know which bet you are making before you sign.

Frequently Asked Questions