Which Condo Unit Sizes Appreciate Fastest? (Singapore)

Premium Study 4 min read Last reviewed
TL;DR
Among Singapore condos, 3-bedroom units appreciated fastest (6.0% median return) while 1-bedroom units lagged at 2.7% — a 3.3-point spread across unit sizes.
💡 The verdict

Among Singapore condos, 3-bedroom units appreciated fastest (6.0% median return) while 1-bedroom units lagged at 2.7% — a 3.3-point spread across unit sizes.

6.0%
Best band: 3-bedroom
2.7%
Weakest band: 1-bedroom
+3.3 pts
Return spread
18,523
Matched resales

This study isolates one variable — unit size — and measures whether it earned a resale-return premium across Singapore condos, using matched buy→sell pairs from URA caveat data (as of July 2026). We hold nothing else constant beyond the unit size split, so read the pattern as a directional signal, not a controlled experiment. The full band breakdown is below.

1-bedroom
2.7%
2-bedroom
4.6%
3-bedroom
6.0%
4-bedroom
5.5%
5+-bedroom
4.2%

Return by unit size — Singapore

Median annualised return, profitable-resale share, median holding period and matched-pair count for each unit size.

Unit sizeMedian return/yrProfitableMedian holdPairs
1-bedroom2.7%73%1.2 yrs2,413
2-bedroom4.6%83%1.2 yrs3,755
3-bedroom6.0%88%1.2 yrs7,149
4-bedroom5.5%86%1.4 yrs2,787
5+-bedroom4.2%78%1.5 yrs1,174
Key Takeaways
  • The 3-bedroom band led with a 6.0% median annualised return in Singapore.
  • The gap to the weakest band (1-bedroom) was 3.3 percentage points — a meaningful, tradeable difference.
  • Returns are unlevered and pre-cost; a mortgage would amplify both the winners and the laggards.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which condo unit size appreciates fastest?

In Singapore, the 3-bedroom band led with the strongest median resale return, 3.3 percentage points ahead of the weakest 1-bedroom band. The full table above shows every band with its profitable-resale share and holding period.

Is this a controlled comparison?

No. The study splits matched resale pairs by a single attribute but does not hold location, age or condition constant. Treat the gap as a directional signal about how the attribute has behaved historically, not as an isolated causal premium.

Are these figures net of costs?

No — they are raw-price CAGRs from URA caveats, before stamp duty, mortgage interest, agent fees and renovation. They are best used to compare bands against each other, not as a take-home return.

Methodology & Sources

Numbers in this article reflect as of July 2026 and update on an irregular schedule.

Transaction data sourced from URA.

  • Matched buy→sell pairs are inferred from URA resale caveats via a (floor band, area, bedroom) proxy; annualised return is the CAGR between purchase and resale.
  • Only the unit size split is controlled; other differences between projects are not held constant, so treat the gap as directional.
  • Returns are raw-price estimates before stamp duty, financing and renovation, and are historical, not a forecast.

Outlier-resistant medians anchor every PSF figure shown above. Volume counts are exact transaction tallies, not estimates.