District 9 (Orchard) vs District 19 (Hougang): MRT premium comparison
- District A
- D9 — River Valley / Orchard (CCR)
- District B
- D19 — Hougang / Punggol (OCR)
- Distance band
- Within 500m vs 500m–1,000m
- Property type
- Non-landed private (condo)
- Time range
- 5-year rolling (2021–2026)
- D9 median premium (within 500m)
- ~8% PSF above 500m–1km band
- D19 median premium (within 500m)
- ~19% PSF above 500m–1km band
- Premium trend (D19, 12-month)
- Widening (+2.3 ppt year-on-year)
How to read this: Counterintuitively, the MRT premium is lower in D9 than D19 — because D9 is already dense and high-value, so the baseline 500m–1km band is already expensive. In D19 (mass-market OCR), buyers strongly discount non-walkable locations, so the gap between distance bands is wider. This tells a buyer in D19 to pay a real premium for confirmed walkable stock rather than compromise on a unit 800m from the station. It also tells an investor that the MRT premium in D19 has more growth runway than in D9, where the gap has remained stable for 4+ years.