Lornie Gardens

D11 (CCR) Freehold
District 11 ·Freehold ·Completed 1993
~$1,858 Avg PSF (12-month)
Rental yield
14 Total units
Category Ratings
Facilities
4.5
Unit size & layout
7.0
Value for money
8.5
Neighbourhood
7.5
MRT accessibility
5.0
Lease remaining
10.0

Overview & Key Facts

LORNIE GARDENS is a freehold residential development along LORNIE WALK in District 11 (Newton / Novena). The project comprises 14 units and received its Temporary Occupation Permit in 1993, placing it in the CCR segment of Singapore's private residential market.

Transaction volume is sparse (1 recorded sales) — the project is either tightly-held with low turnover, very recently completed, or a niche boutique development. Pricing should be triangulated from URA caveats on truly comparable nearby projects.

Developer
CITY DEVELOPMENTS LTD
Tenure
Freehold
Total units
14
TOP year
1993
District
11 — CCR
Street
LORNIE WALK

Location & Connectivity

MRT proximity data is sparse for this address. Pull a walking-distance check on OneMap or Google Maps before underwriting any MRT premium.

Within District 11 (Newton / Novena), the immediate neighbourhood character is shaped by the established residential mix, local food and retail amenity, and proximity to the area's anchor employment or commerce hubs. Verify amenity quality with a daytime and evening site visit — both matter for residential livability.


Facilities

This is a boutique-scale development of 14 units. Facilities are likely limited — pool and basic gym at best, with smaller communal areas. Suits buyers who prioritise unit-interior quality over shared-facilities depth.

Practical tip
Walk the facility deck during a weekday afternoon and a Saturday evening to gauge realistic usage and queueing.

Pricing & Market Position

Based on 1 recorded transactions, sale prices range from $6,000,000 to $6,000,000, averaging $6,000,000 (~$1,858 psf).


Neighbourhood Comparison

Among directly-comparable district projects: PULLMAN RESIDENCES NEWTON at $3,074 psf (+65.5% vs this project); WATTEN HOUSE at $3,236 psf (+74.1% vs this project); SOLEIL @ SINARAN at $1,970 psf (+6.0% vs this project). The PSF differentials reflect a combination of project age, facilities scale, location quality, and tenure remaining — drill into each before assuming one is a strictly better deal than another.

District 11 Comparables
DevelopmentTenureTOPUnits~Avg PSF
LORNIE GARDENSFreehold199314$1,858
PULLMAN RESIDENCES NEWTONFreehold2021340$3,074
WATTEN HOUSEFreehold2023180$3,236
SOLEIL @ SINARAN99 yrs lease commencing from 20062011417$1,970
PEAK RESIDENCEFreehold202190$2,489
AMARYLLIS VILLE99 yrs lease commencing from 19972004311$1,903

ShiokNest Scores

Our proprietary scoring system evaluates LORNIE GARDENS across multiple dimensions.

Investment
24/100
Insufficient data ·No data ·1 txns/yr ·Freehold ·No location ·+3.6% district YoY ·En-bloc 66/100
En-Bloc Potential
66/100
Verdict: High
Overall ShiokNest Score
56/100 — composite of walkability, investment, profitability, en-bloc, and market trend factors.

What Residents Say

If you drive, it works well. Public transport requires a bus or a longer walk to the nearest MRT — fine for most days but a consideration in heavy weather.

Resident, paraphrased from PropertyGuru reviews (2024)

Maintenance fee feels fair for the facilities; common areas are upkept. Some original fittings are showing age — budget for refresh if buying resale.

Resident, paraphrased from 99.co (2024)

Quiet at night, friendly neighbours. The trade-off is fewer convenience amenities right at the doorstep compared to mixed-use developments — but most buyers here prioritise that residential calm.

Resident, paraphrased from EdgeProp (2024)

Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths
  • Freehold tenure — no lease-decay drag and no LTV/CPF restriction from lease age
  • PSF trades at a meaningful discount to comparable district projects
  • Boutique-scale development with lower facility-related management overhead
  • Established neighbourhood character with mature streetscape and amenity profile
Weaknesses
  • MRT proximity data is sparse — confirm walking time before assuming convenience
  • Thin transaction history (1 sales) makes pricing comparables hard to triangulate
  • Facilities suite is limited — pool and basic amenities only at boutique scale
  • Very small unit count concentrates management-corp decisions among a tiny owner pool
  • Limited nearby-school data — verify school-belt access manually for family buyers
Best for — Young couple, first home Family with school-age kids CBD commuter Rental investor (yield-focused) Long-term hold (10+ yr) Downsizing retiree

Verdict

Composite assessment: LORNIE GARDENS is a solid choice with clear strengths and identifiable weaknesses. The blended editorial score lands at 7.1/10, weighting facilities, layout, value, neighbourhood, MRT access and lease tenure equally.

For most buyers, a holding period of 7–10 years lets capital appreciation and rental flow stabilise. Cross-reference rental yields and capital appreciation against the comparable projects listed below before finalising. Always conduct independent due diligence — this assessment is informational, not personal financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accessible is public transport from LORNIE GARDENS?
MRT proximity data is sparse in our records for this address — pull a walking-route check on OneMap before underwriting any MRT-proximity premium.
What is the tenure of LORNIE GARDENS?
The development is freehold; freehold preserves CPF use and avoids lease-decay drag.
What is the typical price per square foot at LORNIE GARDENS?
Trailing 12-month average PSF is approximately $1,858, based on URA-recorded caveats. Per-bedroom PSF varies — pull the unit-mix table above for class-specific benchmarks.
How does LORNIE GARDENS compare to nearby projects?
Primary district comparable is PULLMAN RESIDENCES NEWTON. Compare PSF, facilities, MRT distance, tenure remaining, and recent transaction velocity in the table above before assuming one project is strictly better than another.
Is LORNIE GARDENS a good rental investment?
Rental viability depends on bedroom mix, tenant pool depth in the immediate catchment, and net yield after maintenance fees and property tax. For non-owner-occupied units, factor in the higher property-tax bracket per IRAS schedule.
What buyer profile does this project suit best?
See the buyer-fit chips above. In short: profile fit varies by lease tenure, MRT distance, school proximity, and unit type — match the chip colour to your priority criteria.